Congress MP Manish Tewari Opposes Delimitation Exercise, Citing Disproportionate Impact on North, South, and Northeast India
Local
•3 min read

Congress MP Manish Tewari Opposes Delimitation Exercise, Citing Disproportionate Impact on North, South, and Northeast India

BN

Curated By

BatchNode Editorial Desk

AI REPORT
Share

Congress MP Manish Tewari has expressed strong opposition to the proposed delimitation exercise, arguing that it could adversely affect states in North India, South India, and the Northeast, many of which share international borders, while disproportionately benefiting the central part of the country.

Tewari emphasized that the concerns of northern and northeastern states, particularly those located along India’s international borders, must be taken seriously before any decision is taken on the delimitation process. He maintained that the proposed exercise could have wider implications for regional representation and the federal balance.

The Congress MP’s remarks came amid a renewed political debate over the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill and the Delimitation Bill, 2026. The proposed legislation, which seeks to amend the provisions connected with the already passed Women’s Reservation Act, 2023, had earlier failed to secure passage in the Lok Sabha during the Budget Session in April.

Tewari argued that the Centre should not make the implementation of women’s reservation dependent on the delimitation process. He suggested that the Women’s Reservation Bill, which has already been passed by Parliament, should be implemented using the existing number of Lok Sabha seats rather than waiting for a fresh delimitation exercise.

The renewed discussion over delimitation of parliamentary constituencies in India has gained momentum around the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, which seeks to expand the strength of the Lok Sabha and revise the allocation of seats ahead of the 2029 general elections. The Centre is seeking political consensus following the earlier legislative setback, while the proposed changes have triggered concerns among several states over federal equity, regional representation, and the balance of political power.

States in southern India and other progressive regions have raised concerns that a population-based delimitation could disadvantage them for successfully implementing population-control measures over the years. They fear that states which have witnessed faster population growth could gain a greater share of parliamentary seats, while states that successfully stabilised their population could see their relative representation decline.

The Centre maintains that the delimitation exercise is intended to modernise democratic representation and ensure that parliamentary constituencies reflect the country’s changing population.

Experimental Hub

Notice & Guidelines

Welcome to thehmars. This is an experimental, automated news portal. Please note:

•

Raw Feeds: Content is scraped and posted automatically; no manual editing or fact-checking is performed.

•

Desktop First: Optimized for standard monitor sizes. Mobile devices may encounter layout offsets.

•

W.I.P.: Donation and newsletter systems are temporarily paused during active internal upgrades.

Spot a bug, want to contribute, or interested in a setup like this? Reach out via the contact form.