Australia is considering, for the first time, a deliberate policy to push net overseas migration into negative territory. Historically, periods of net outflow have coincided with economic collapse, war or pandemic, not with intentional government action. Economists such as Mark Cully describe the proposal as unprecedented.
The idea is being promoted by populist politicians. Pauline Hanson’s One Nation pledges to cut temporary migration by 766,000 over three years, claiming it would lower rental inflation by 6.5 % and save renters about $54 a week. The governing coalition also promises a sharp reduction to 100,000 arrivals per year.
Experts caution that such a drastic reversal would hurt exports, reduce government revenue and trigger a prolonged economic slump. Peter Tulip, former RBA economist, notes that while the modelling is not implausible, the broader consequences could outweigh the housing benefits. Cully warns that negative net migration is linked to deep recessions.
Analysts argue the real problem lies in an unregulated temporary visa system that has more than doubled in share of the population. Alan Gamlen of ANU stresses that targeted regulation, not a complete brake, is needed. He doubts that the populist promises will be enacted and warns against blaming external factors when targets fail.
.png?trim=0,0,0,0&width=1200&height=800&crop=1200:800)
